The Verdict That Named Developmental Vulnerability as Corporate Responsibility
The Girl Who Took Instagram to Court
Kaley* was six years old when she created her first YouTube account and nine years old when she joined Instagram. By her early teens, she was spending nearly 16 hours a day on these platforms, managing multiple accounts to inflate the number of likes on her photos and routinely using filters to “correct” perceived flaws. This fixation on her appearance was not always present. It emerged gradually after she began using social media and, by early adolescence, developed into a diagnosable condition: body dysmorphic disorder.
In 2025, Kaley’s experience became the basis for K.G.M. v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al., a landmark case that formally recognized this link between early social platform use and clinical harm. A U.S. jury concluded that Kaley’s condition was not simply an outcome of media exposure. Rather, it found that Meta and Google, despite knowing the risks, had deliberately engineered their platforms, through algorithmic recommendations, infinite scroll, autoplay, and visible engagement metrics, to maximize user engagement. In doing so, they created systems that interact with children and teens’ developmental vulnerabilities in ways that can produce clinically significant harm, such as what Kaley experienced.
Why Developing Brains are the Perfect Target
Understanding this outcome requires examining the mechanisms through which sustained exposure to social platforms during these formative years shapes development. Social media environments are saturated with highly visual, appearance-focused content that narrates appearance ideals. These narratives invite constant self-comparison, often leading to body dissatisfaction. But exposure alone does not fully explain Kaley’s diagnosis. A critical factor in these effects is whether children internalize these appearance ideals. Once internalized, youth are more likely to seek out and engage with content that promotes these ideals. That engagement, in turn, “trains” algorithmic systems to deliver more of the same, creating a reinforcing feedback loop that intensifies both exposure and internalization. The result is a gradual escalation where a youth with a minor appearance concern is drawn into an environment that repeatedly amplifies and validates that concern.
This pattern is especially consequential given how early these developmental processes begin – and how early Kaley began using social platforms. Research shows that girls as young as three years old can internalize and emotionally invest in a thin ideal, establishing a foundation for later body dissatisfaction. More often than not, these early beliefs do not dissipate, but rather persist into adolescence, where they intensify and become linked to broader mental and physical health risks. Within this developmental context, early and sustained exposure to social platforms does more than reflect cultural ideals; it actively shapes how children understand their bodies, their identities, and their self-worth. Considering this, the trajectory observed in K.G.M. v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al. from early social platform use to a clinical concern is not anomalous, but developmentally predictable when these early vulnerabilities are repeatedly engaged and amplified over time.
Critically, this same developmental window also limits young people’s ability to resist or regulate these digital and algorithmic influences. During late childhood and especially adolescence, youth develop more advanced abstract and metacognitive abilities, allowing them to reflect on themselves in increasingly complex ways. However, this growing capacity for self-reflection means that negative experiences are more likely to be interpreted as broad, negative judgments about the self. At the same time, these cognitive changes unfold alongside a brain that is highly reactive to emotional and socially salient stimuli, but still developing the regulatory systems needed to manage them. The result is a heightened vulnerability to rumination. Adolescents may repeatedly dwell on perceived flaws while struggling to disengage or reframe these thoughts. This ruminative pattern not only intensifies distress but also drives continued engagement with appearance-related content, reinforcing the very algorithmic feedback loops that sustain and amplify the concern over time.
From Dissatisfaction to Disorder
This cycle of rumination and algorithmically reinforced appearance-focused content can produce something more entrenched than body dissatisfaction: body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). BDD is a clinical condition characterized by obsessive preoccupation with a perceived physical flaw that is either invisible or minimal to others, and it typically emerges during early adolescence. Research consistently places the average onset of BDD between ages 12 and 16, with sub-clinical symptoms beginning earlier. This means the condition gradually develops with the internalization of cultural norms and the algorithmic-assisted rumination that social media’s design actively cultivates. Although heritability estimates suggest genetics explain 37-49% of the variance in BDD, this means the majority of risk is attributable to environmental factors, among which childhood exposure to appearance-focused, algorithmically driven social media is increasingly implicated. It is precisely this environmental pathway that Kaley’s case illustrates: she testified that she did not experience symptoms of body dysmorphia before her social media use, and that it developed alongside her use of beauty filters and constant social comparison on these platforms – a sequence that mirrors what the research on BDD’s developmental trajectory would predict. While this area of research is still emerging, a growing body of evidence links filter use to dysmorphic symptoms in both adolescent boys and girls.
Designing With Development in Mind
By recognizing that platform design can interact with normative developmental processes to produce clinical harm, K.G.M. v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al. challenges the longstanding assumption that negative outcomes from social platform use are an unavoidable byproduct of exposure to highly visual digital environments. Instead, it positions these outcomes as partially engineered. This distinction carries broader implications. If these harms are predictable, they are preventable. Addressing them, however, requires moving beyond a focus on individual behavior and personal responsibility, such as limiting screen time and developing media literacy skills, and toward a more critical examination of the systems themselves. In particular, it raises questions about how platforms might be designed differently if child development, rather than engagement maximization, were treated as the central constraint.
*Name changed for privacy.
References
Allyn, B. (2026). Jury finds Meta and Google negligent in social media harms trial. NPR. Retrieved from: https://www.npr.org/2026/03/25/nx-s1-5746125/meta-youtube-social-media-trial-verdict
CBS News. (2026). “I wanted to be on it all the time,” plaintiff says in landmark social media addiction trial. CBS NEWS. Retrieved from: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/instagram-meta-youtube-social-media-trial-plaintiff-testifies-kgm/
Davison, K., Markey, C., & Birch, L. (2003). A longitudinal examination of patterns in girls’ weight concerns and body dissatisfaction from ages 5 to 9 years. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 33, 320-332. doi: 10.1002/eat.10142
Ganson, K.T., Testa, A., Rodgers, R.F., & Nagata, J.M. (2024). Use of photo filters is associated with muscle dysmorphia symptomatology among adolescents and young adults. Body Image, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101750
Gupta, M., Jassi, A., & Krebs, G. (2023). The association between social media use and body dysmorphic symptoms in young people. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231801
Harringer, J.A., Calogero, R.M., Witherington, D.C., & Smith, J.E. (2010). Body size stereotyping and internalization of the thin ideal in preschool girls. Sex Roles, 63, 609-620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9868-1
Hayes, K., Bowes, P., & Morris, R. (2026). ‘I was on Instagram all day’ – woman tells landmark trial. BBC. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c89kdpjn7eqo
Krebs, G., Rautio, D., Fernández de la Cruz, L., Hartmann, A.S., Jassi, A., Martin, A., Stringaris, A., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2024). Practitioner review: Assessment and treatment of body dysmorphic disorder in young people. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 65, 1119-1131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13984
Krebs, G., Clark, B.R., Ford, T.J., & Stringaris, A. (2025). Epidemiology of body dysmorphic disorder and appearance preoccupation in youth: Prevalence, comorbidity, and psychosocial impairment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 64, 30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.01.017
Kvardova, N., Machackova, H., Maes, C., & Vandenbosch, L. (2025). Navigating beauty standards on social media: Impact of appearance activity on adolescents’ body dissatisfaction.
Lavell, C.H., Oar, E.L., & Rapee, R.M. (2025). Peer relationships and social media use in adolescents with body dysmorphic disorder. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 53, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-024-01245-2
Perez, M., Kroon Van Diest, A.M., Smith, H., & Sladek, M.R. (2018). Body dissatisfaction and its correlates in 5- to 7- year-old girls: A social learning experiment. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47, 757-769. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1157758
Rück, C., Mataix-Cols, D., Feusner, J.D., Shavitt, R.G., Veale, D., & Fernández de la Cruz, L. (2025). Body dysmorphic disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 92. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00577-z
Saiphoo, A., & Vahedi, Z. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028
Smith, D.L., Damiano, S.R., McLean, S.A., Wertheim, E.H., & Paxton, S.J. (2024). Biopsychosocial correlates of body dissatisfaction in 7- to 8-year old children: A cross-sectional and prospective investigation. Journal of Eating Disorders. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01178-7
Yang, H., Wang, J.J., Tng, G., & Yang, S. (2020). Effects of social media and smartphone use on body esteem in female adolescents: Testing a cognitive and affective model. Children, 7. doi: 10.3390/children7090148
Melinda Karth, PhD
Children and Screens
Kate Blocker, PhD
Children and Screens
Join Division 46
The Society for Media Psychology and Technology is accepting new members!
Follow Division 46:
More From Spring/Summer 2026
What the Media Does to the Mind—And What Psychology Must Do About It
President’s Column, by Lawrence M. Drake II, PhD
Before the House Is Built: Psychology's Narrowing Window in the Age of AI
Past President’s Column, by Kristian A. Alomá, PhD
From Facilitator to Participant: Our Evolving Relationship with Media and Technology
President-Elect’s Column, by Christopher L. Heffner, PsyD, PhD
Social Media and the Shifting Semiotics of the Tiny Microphone
Editor’s Column, by Perry A. Reed, PhD
Review of Understanding Parasocial Relationships
By Jessie Buttafuoco, MA
Consumption at its Finest!: The Mental Health Risks Promoted by Social Media Fast Fashion
By Abbigail McGee & K. Meghan Hopper, PhD
What We’re Missing About Age, Race and Polarization
By Scott M. Debb, EdD
The Cloud is a Media Psychology Marketing Metaphor
By Bernard Luskin, EdD, MFT
The Verdict That Named Developmental Vulnerability as Corporate Responsibility
By Melinda Karth, PhD & Kate Blocker, PhD